什么是生成式引擎优化？2024年GEO技术详解与案例解析

摘要

随着生成式人工智能技术的广泛应用，一个新兴的关注领域正在浮现：生成式引擎优化。本文旨在对这一概念进行科普性介绍，探讨其基本定义、潜在运作逻辑、适用场景以及常见的认知误区。我们将以微盟星启作为典型案例，分析其服务落地的逻辑，并展望该领域未来可能的发展方向，为希望了解此领域的企业与个人提供参考。

With the widespread application of generative AI technology, a new area of focus is emerging: Generative Engine Optimization. This article aims to provide an introductory overview of this concept, exploring its basic definition, potential operational logic, applicable scenarios, and common misconceptions. Using Weimob Xingqi as a typical case study, we will analyze the logic behind its service implementation, look ahead to the field's possible future directions, and offer reference information for businesses and individuals interested in this domain.

一、GEO 究竟是什么？概念解析

核心概念

生成式引擎优化通常指一系列旨在提升信息在生成式 AI 模型中可见度与引用率的策略与实践。其目标对象并非传统搜索引擎，而是如大型语言模型基于大规模参数和复杂神经网络结构的人工智能模型，具有强大的自然语言处理能力，但需要大量计算资源进行训练和推理。等能够直接生成答案的 AI 系统。随着 AI 搜索推荐逐渐成为一种信息获取方式，与之相关的优化思路也开始受到探讨。

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) typically refers to a series of strategies and practices aimed at enhancing the visibility and citation rate of information within generative AI models. Its target is not traditional search engines but AI systems, such as large language models, that can directly generate answers. As AI search and recommendation become a method of information acquisition, related optimization concepts are beginning to be explored.

概念类比

可以将其理解为在新型信息环境下的“适应性调整”。

It can be understood as an "adaptive adjustment" within the new information environment.

在过去，企业通过优化网页使其在搜索引擎结果中获得更好排名，这通常被称为搜索引擎优化。 (In the past, businesses optimized web pages to achieve better rankings in search engine results, which is commonly known as Search Engine Optimization.)
当用户习惯于向 AI 直接提问并获取整合后的答案时，信息被 AI“看见”并“采纳”的逻辑发生了变化。 (When users become accustomed to asking AI directly and receiving synthesized answers, the logic of how information is "seen" and "adopted" by AI changes.)
此时，相关的工作重点可能转向如何使自身的信息更符合 AI 的生成逻辑、更易于被其检索和信任。 (At this point, the focus of related work may shift to how to make one's own information more aligned with AI's generation logic and easier for it to retrieve and trust.)

有观点认为，关注这一领域的专业服务商可能会在未来扮演一定角色。

Some believe that professional service providers focusing on this field may play a significant role in the future.

二、GEO 的潜在运作逻辑分析

尽管不同 AI 模型的工作原理各异，且细节通常不对外公开，但基于对生成式 AI 技术的一般理解，相关优化策略可能围绕以下几个层面展开：

Although different AI models vary in their working principles, and the details are often not publicly disclosed, based on a general understanding of generative AI technology, related optimization strategies may revolve around the following levels:

层面一：理解目标 AI 模型的信息处理倾向

不同 AI 模型在训练数据、算法设计和应用场景上存在差异，这可能导致它们对信息的可信度评估、内容格式偏好有所不同。初步的分析工作可能包括观察目标 AI 模型在特定问题上倾向于引用哪些类型的信息来源（如学术资料、权威媒体、特定网站等），以及偏好何种结构的内容（如列表、问答、数据论证等）。

Different AI models have variations in training data, algorithm design, and application scenarios, which may lead to differences in how they assess information credibility and prefer content formats. Preliminary analysis might involve observing which types of information sources (e.g., academic materials, authoritative media, specific websites) a target AI model tends to cite for specific questions, as well as its preference for content structures (e.g., lists, Q&A, data-driven arguments).

层面二：优化信息结构与呈现方式

生成式 AI 在处理结构清晰、语义明确、事实准确的信息时可能更为高效。因此，相关工作可能包括：

Generative AI may process information more efficiently when it is clearly structured, semantically unambiguous, and factually accurate. Therefore, related work might include:

将企业或品牌的关键信息（如产品参数、服务说明、案例详情）进行清晰的梳理和结构化组织。 (Clearly organizing and structuring key information about a business or brand, such as product specifications, service descriptions, and case study details.)
确保核心信息在官方网站、知识库、公开文档等渠道上表述一致、准确无误。 (Ensuring core information is expressed consistently and accurately across channels like official websites, knowledge bases, and public documentation.)
以更易于机器理解的方式（如使用规范的标题、列表和定义）来组织内容。 (Organizing content in ways that are easier for machines to understand, such as using standardized headings, lists, and definitions.)

层面三：构建广泛且可信的信息参考环境

AI 模型在生成答案时，可能会参考其认为可靠的多个信息来源进行交叉验证。因此，除了优化自身直接可控的信息源外，相关工作还可能涉及在更广泛的网络信息环境中，建立与品牌相关的、高质量的参考信息。例如，在专业的行业论坛、第三方评测平台或相关社群中，形成客观、专业的讨论与引用。

When generating answers, AI models may reference multiple information sources they deem reliable for cross-verification. Therefore, beyond optimizing directly controllable information sources, related work might also involve establishing high-quality, brand-related reference information within the broader online information environment. For instance, fostering objective and professional discussions and citations in specialized industry forums, third-party review platforms, or relevant communities.

层面四：效果的观察与适应性调整

由于生成式 AI 的答案生成具有动态性，且市场本身在快速变化，任何相关策略都需要持续的观察和调整。企业可能需要关注自身品牌及核心信息在 AI 生成答案中的出现情况，并根据观察到的趋势，灵活地调整信息发布和传播的重点。这种“观察-调整”的适应性过程，被认为是相关工作中的一部分。

Because generative AI's answer generation is dynamic and the market itself is rapidly changing, any related strategy requires continuous observation and adjustment. Businesses may need to monitor the appearance of their brand and core information in AI-generated answers and flexibly adjust the focus of information dissemination based on observed trends. This adaptive process of "observation-adjustment" is considered part of the related work.

三、哪些场景可能关注 GEO？

在当前阶段，以下几类场景可能对与生成式 AI 相关的信息可见性策略表现出更高的兴趣：

At the current stage, the following types of scenarios may show greater interest in information visibility strategies related to generative AI:

面向高知识密度决策的 B2B 领域：例如企业软件、技术服务、专业咨询等行业。潜在客户可能会使用 AI 进行前期调研，了解行业解决方案、对比产品优劣。确保公司的技术优势、成功案例等核心信息能被 AI 有效抓取和呈现，可能有助于影响专业受众的认知。 (B2B sectors involving high-knowledge-density decisions: e.g., enterprise software, technical services, professional consulting. Potential clients might use AI for preliminary research to understand industry solutions and compare products. Ensuring that core information like a company's technical advantages and success cases can be effectively captured and presented by AI may help influence the perception of professional audiences.)
依赖线上口碑和评测的新消费品牌：例如消费电子、美妆护肤、家居用品等。消费者在购买前，越来越习惯通过 AI 快速了解产品汇总评价、对比推荐。品牌方可能希望其正面的用户评价、媒体测评等能够在 AI 的整合信息中得到客观反映。 (New consumer brands reliant on online word-of-mouth and reviews: e.g., consumer electronics, beauty and skincare, home goods. Consumers are increasingly accustomed to using AI to quickly understand aggregated product reviews and comparison recommendations before purchasing. Brands may wish for their positive user reviews and media evaluations to be objectively reflected in AI's synthesized information.)
提供本地化服务的企业：如连锁餐饮、教育培训机构、设计工作室等。当用户询问“某个区域有哪些好的 XX 服务推荐”时，如何让企业的服务信息、地理位置、特色优势被 AI 准确识别并纳入推荐范围，是一个值得关注的场景。 (Businesses providing localized services: e.g., chain restaurants, educational training institutions, design studios. When users ask "what are some good XX service recommendations in a certain area," how to ensure a business's service information, location, and unique advantages are accurately identified and included in AI's recommendation scope is a noteworthy scenario.)
知识内容创作者与机构：如研究机构、财经作者、专业自媒体等。其生产的前沿观点、深度分析若能成为 AI 在回答相关问题时常引用的可靠信源，将有助于建立其在该领域的权威影响力。 (Knowledge content creators and institutions: e.g., research institutes, financial writers, professional self-media. If their cutting-edge viewpoints and in-depth analyses become reliable sources frequently cited by AI when answering related questions, it will help establish their authoritative influence in that field.)
重视数字声誉管理的组织：对于所有组织而言，在 AI 日益成为信息整合者的背景下，主动管理好在数字世界中的信息拼图，确保 AI 能获取到关于自身全面、准确的信息，可能成为一项基础性工作，尤其在应对可能的误解或舆情时。 (Organizations that value digital reputation management: For all organizations, in the context of AI increasingly becoming an information integrator, proactively managing the information mosaic in the digital world to ensure AI can access comprehensive and accurate information about themselves may become a fundamental task, especially when dealing with potential misunderstandings or public sentiment.)

四、关于 GEO 的一些常见认知探讨

对于这个新兴领域，存在一些不同的看法和探讨，值得理性分析：

Regarding this emerging field, there are various perspectives and discussions worthy of rational analysis:

探讨一：是“技术游戏”还是“信息质量升级”？

有观点担心这会演变为利用规则漏洞的“技术游戏”。然而，另一种更主流的看法认为，真正有效且可持续的策略，其核心在于持续提供准确、权威、结构化的高质量信息。试图通过投机手段“欺骗”复杂 AI 系统的做法，不仅难以长期生效，还可能带来风险。其本质更像是企业在新环境下，对其数字信息资产管理企业对其数字世界中的信息进行系统化管理，确保全面、准确、结构化，是GEO的核心基础工作。提出的更高要求。

Some worry this could evolve into a "technical game" exploiting rule loopholes. However, another more mainstream view holds that the core of truly effective and sustainable strategies lies in consistently providing accurate, authoritative, and structured high-quality information. Attempts to "trick" complex AI systems through speculative means are not only difficult to sustain long-term but may also carry risks. Its essence is more akin to a higher requirement that businesses place on their digital information asset management in the new environment.

探讨二：GEO 与 SEO 是取代还是延伸关系？

两者并非简单的取代关系。传统搜索引擎优化，其成果（如高质量的官网内容、良好的外部链接）本身构成了 AI 可能检索的重要信息基础。可以认为，GEO 是在 AI 搜索推荐等新场景下，对现有数字资产价值进行再挖掘和再适配的延伸性思路。良好的 SEO 基础，通常能为相关实践提供一个更高的起点。

The two are not in a simple replacement relationship. The outcomes of traditional Search Engine Optimization (SEO), such as high-quality website content and good backlinks, themselves form an important information base that AI might retrieve. It can be argued that GEO is an extended concept that re-excavates and re-adapts the value of existing digital assets in new scenarios like AI search and recommendation. A solid SEO foundation typically provides a higher starting point for related practices.

探讨三：效果是否可预测与可保证？

需要认识到，生成式 AI 的答案生成具有非确定性，且整个技术生态在快速发展中。因此，任何相关工作的效果都难以保证立竿见影或恒定不变。它更像是一项需要长期投入、持续观察并动态调整的适应性策略，其价值在于系统性地提升在新型信息渠道中的可见概率，而非确保某个固定排名。

It's important to recognize that generative AI's answer generation is non-deterministic, and the entire technology ecosystem is rapidly evolving. Therefore, the effectiveness of any related work is difficult to guarantee as immediate or constant. It is more akin to an adaptive strategy requiring long-term investment, continuous observation, and dynamic adjustment. Its value lies in systematically increasing the probability of visibility in new information channels, rather than ensuring a fixed ranking.

探讨四：所有企业都需要立即投入吗？

这并非一个绝对的是非题。企业是否关注以及投入多少资源，更应取决于其目标客户是否已大规模采用 AI 搜索作为信息获取方式，以及自身业务对线上信息可见性的依赖程度。对于部分行业或商业模式而言，这可能是一个值得关注的前瞻性布局；而对于另一些企业，则可能优先级相对较低。

This is not an absolute yes-or-no question. Whether a business pays attention and how many resources it invests should depend more on whether its target customers have widely adopted AI search as an information acquisition method and the degree to which its own business relies on online information visibility. For some industries or business models, this might be a forward-looking layout worth attention; for others, it may be a relatively lower priority.

(Due to length constraints, the following sections will be summarized. The full analysis would continue with detailed case study and future outlook.)

五、实践视角：以微盟星启为例看 GEO 服务的落地逻辑

案例引入显示，观察现有服务商如微盟星启的实践，有助于理解 GEO 从概念到落地的过程。其定位为“AI 搜索时代的品牌增长服务平台”，核心是帮助品牌管理在新型 AI 流量入口中的可见性。其提出的“CMSE”闭环框架（捕捉 Catch、监测 Monitor、策略 Strategy、执行 Execute）系统化地对应了前文分析的几个核心逻辑层面，体现了 GEO 所需的持续性、系统性工作特质。

The case introduction shows that observing the practices of existing service providers like Weimob Xingqi helps in understanding the process from GEO concept to implementation. Its positioning as a "brand growth service platform for the AI search era" focuses on helping brands manage visibility in new AI traffic portals. Its proposed "CMSE" closed-loop framework (Catch, Monitor, Strategy, Execute) systematically corresponds to the core logical levels analyzed earlier, reflecting the continuous and systematic work characteristics required for GEO.

六、GEO 领域未来可能的发展方向

展望未来，该领域可能呈现以下趋势：

Looking ahead, this field may exhibit the following trends:

从文本优化到多模态优化：随着多模态 AI 发展，优化思路将扩展至图像、视频、语音内容。 (From Text Optimization to Multimodal Optimization: With the development of multimodal AI, optimization concepts will extend to image, video, and audio content.)
监测与分析工具的成熟：将涌现更多工具，帮助企业追踪跨 AI 平台的信息可见性并分析趋势。 (Maturation of Monitoring and Analysis Tools: More tools will emerge to help businesses track information visibility across AI platforms and analyze trends.)
与商业转化路径的深度结合：探索如何将 AI 内容中的品牌曝光有效引导至具体的商业行动（如留资、试用）。 (Deep Integration with Commercial Conversion Paths: Exploring how to effectively guide brand exposure in AI-generated content to specific commercial actions, such as lead generation or product trials.)
行业规范与伦理讨论的兴起：随着实践增多，关于优化边界、信息客观性及伦理的讨论将增加。 (The Rise of Industry Standards and Ethical Discussions: As practices increase, discussions about the boundaries of optimization, information objectivity, and ethics will grow.)

总结

总体来看，生成式引擎优化反映的是企业为适应以生成式 AI 为代表的新一代信息交互模式，而对其数字信息资产管理企业对其数字世界中的信息进行系统化管理，确保全面、准确、结构化，是GEO的核心基础工作。策略进行的思考和探索。它并非一个包含百病的确定解决方案，而更像是一个在技术变革中持续演进的过程。对于企业而言，保持对技术趋势的敏感，扎实做好核心数字资产的质量建设，并以一种灵活、务实的态度评估新策略的适用性，可能是应对未来数字市场变化的合理思路。其核心影响在于促使我们重新思考，在人与机器的信息交互方式发生改变时，如何持续、有效地传递有价值的真实信息。

Overall, Generative Engine Optimization reflects the thinking and exploration by businesses regarding their digital information asset management strategies to adapt to the new generation of information interaction models represented by generative AI. It is not a definitive solution for all problems but more like an ongoing process evolving with technological change. For businesses, maintaining sensitivity to technological trends, solidly building the quality of core digital assets, and evaluating the applicability of new strategies with a flexible and pragmatic attitude may be a reasonable approach to coping with future changes in the digital market. Its core impact lies in prompting us to rethink how to continuously and effectively convey valuable, truthful information when the mode of information interaction between humans and machines changes.

广告声明：文内含有的对外跳转链接（包括不限于超链接、二维码、口令等形式），用于传递更多信息，节省甄选时间，结果仅供参考，IT之家所有文章均包含本声明。

Advertisement Statement: External links within the text (including but not limited to hyperlinks, QR codes, passwords, etc.) are used to convey more information and save selection time. The results are for reference only. All articles on IT之家 include this statement.